<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://eln.excellgen.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cabon_Nanotube</id>
	<title>Cabon Nanotube - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://eln.excellgen.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cabon_Nanotube"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://eln.excellgen.com/index.php?title=Cabon_Nanotube&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-18T11:23:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://eln.excellgen.com/index.php?title=Cabon_Nanotube&amp;diff=8279&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Paul.xu: Created page with &quot;&lt;br&gt;Quantitative lateral flow immunosensor using carbon nanotubes as label&lt;br&gt;Adeyabeba Abera and Jin-Woo Choi*&lt;br&gt;Received 28th June 2010, Accepted 26th August 2010&lt;br&gt;DOI: 10.1...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://eln.excellgen.com/index.php?title=Cabon_Nanotube&amp;diff=8279&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-02-19T17:42:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Quantitative lateral flow immunosensor using carbon nanotubes as label&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adeyabeba Abera and Jin-Woo Choi*&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Received 28th June 2010, Accepted 26th August 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DOI: 10.1...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Quantitative lateral flow immunosensor using carbon nanotubes as label&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adeyabeba Abera and Jin-Woo Choi*&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Received 28th June 2010, Accepted 26th August 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DOI: 10.1039/c0ay00412j&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A novel immunosensor utilizing multi-walled carbon nanotube as label on a lateral flow system for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;simple and quantitative electrical detection was investigated. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(MWCNTs) were first modified with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for uniform dispersion in aqueous&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution. Then, the MWCNTs were conjugated with human immunoglobulin G (IgG) using 1-(3-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(dimethylamino)-propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) coupling chemistry. The lateral&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;flow immunosensor was made of nitrocellulose membrane that transports sample and reagents through&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a porous structure by capillary action. The performance of the immunosensor was demonstrated using&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG as a model analyte competing with the conjugate (MWCNT-labeled human IgG) at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;capture zone. As a result of binding reaction between the conjugate and the immobilized Protein A at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the capture zone, the conjugated MWCNTs formed a conducting network at the capture zone&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;providing conductance measurement corresponding to the amount of captured conjugate. Quantitative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunoassay response for the target human IgG was demonstrated in the range of 25 to 200 μg mlÀ1&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;without an additional amplification step. The presented immunosensing technique could be expanded&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;for the detection of various analyte-specific biomolecules with a potential for simple and rapid tests&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suitable for point-of-care diagnostics.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;1. Introduction&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lateral flow (LF) immunoassay is one of the most successful&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;point-of-care diagnostic tools commercially available for detecting&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;various health and environmental agents.1–6&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lateral flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunosensor is made of a porous membrane for both immobi-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;lizing biological receptors and transporting sample reagents.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sample reagents are transported in the lateral direction through&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the porous membrane by capillary force and captured by the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;biological receptors immobilized at the capture zone. LF immu-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nosensors are simple to use, low-cost, rapid, and portable with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;relatively long shelf life. Examples of lateral flow diagnostics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;include home pregnancy tests, detection of drugs of abuse, diag-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nosis of infectious diseases, and cancer markers. However, such&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;systems often suffer from low sensitivity, and are mostly restricted&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to qualitative or semi-quantitative measurements.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Generally, LF immunosensors are based on optical detection&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;where tagged particles or enzymes provide visible signal generation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;or amplification. Typically, colloidal gold is used as a label for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric detection traced by the visible color. Several efforts&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;have been made towards signal quantification using enhanced&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric labels or conducting materials such as phosphorescent&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanoparticles,7 polyaniline,8 and polyaniline with colloidal gold.9&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Colorimetric techniques are often limited by low sensitivity while&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;fluorescent techniques suffer from instability, photobleaching,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;activation step, and requirement for a complicated reader device.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This work addresses such limitations by utilizing carbon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanotubes (CNTs) as labeling material for direct electrical signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measurement. CNTs have remarkable one-dimensional elec-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tronic conduction properties and large surface area, and allow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the adsorption of biomolecules for sensing.10–12 In order to utilize&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;these properties of carbon nanotubes for biosensing applications,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surface functionalization is necessary to uniformly disperse&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;CNTs in aqueous solution and immobilize biorecognition&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;molecules on the surface of the nanotubes. Adsorption of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surfactants and polymers on the surface of CNTs is considered as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;an effective method to enhance the dispersion of CNTs without&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;affecting their properties.13–15 Compared to CNTs, other con-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;ducting materials such as colloidal gold and polymer nanowires&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;do not possess the unique material properties suitable for surface&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;functionalization or maintain high electrical conduction after&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding reaction.9,16&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In this work, a new immunoassay technique using carbon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanotube labels on lateral flow system is introduced. The illus-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tration of this technique is shown in Fig. 1. MWCNTs are&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;dispersed in water with PVP using sonication. Adsorption of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;PVP provides a thin and rough layer of organic coating by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;wrapping around the MWCNTs. Human IgG is immobilized on&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the bare (not covered by PVP) surface of the MWCNTs. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNT–human IgG conjugate is then applied on a lateral flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunosensor where the MWCNT–human IgG conjugate is to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;be captured by immobilized Protein A at the capture zone. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated MWCNTs form a conducting network at the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone corresponding to the amount of binding. Consequently,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;quantitative signal can be obtained by simple resistance&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measurement of the capture zone. Blocking schemes were also&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;implemented on the MWCNTs and the lateral flow strips to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;address non-specific interaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2. Methods and experiments&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.1 Materials and reagents&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (purity &amp;amp;gt; 95 wt%)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were obtained from Cheaptubes, Inc. (Brattleboro, VT). Hi-flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Louisiana State&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA; Web: www.ece.lsu.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;edu/biomems/. E-mail: choi@ece.lsu.edu; Tel: +1-225-578-8764&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Anal. Methods, 2010, 2, 1819–1822 | 1819&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;TECHNICAL NOTE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;www.rsc.org/methods | Analytical Methods&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Downloaded on 30 December 2012&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published on 29 September 2010 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C0AY00412J&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Page 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plus nitrocellulose membranes (HF13502), glass fiber pads,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;cellulose membranes, and a supporting card for lateral flow assay&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were obtained from Millipore (Bedford, MA). Protein A sus-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;pended in solution was obtained from BioVision, Inc. (Mountain&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View, CA). Purified human immunoglobulin G (IgG, 6.2 mg mlÀ1)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suspended in 0.01 M sodium phosphate (0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Poly-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;vinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Mw 10 000), bovine serum albumin (BSA),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tween-20, glutaraldehyde, and 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;acid (MES) were from Sigma-Aldrich. 1-(3-(Dimethylamino)-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS) were obtained from&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Rockford, IL). All immunore-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;agents were diluted in pH 7.4 phosphate saline buffer (PBS) unless&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;noted otherwise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.2 MWCNT–antibody conjugation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In order to start the conjugation process, 1.5 mg of carboxylated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNTs were dispersed in 2 ml of deionized (DI) water with 0.6&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;mg of PVP. The solution was sonicated for 4 hours in an ultra-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sonic bath at 27 C to exfoliate the MWCNTs and accelerate the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;dispersion. The dispersed solution was mixed with 1 ml of EDC&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(0.4 M) and sulfo-NHS (0.1 M) in pH 6.1 MES buffer. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution was left to react for 30 minutes with gentle agitation at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;room temperature. The mixture was microcentrifuged at 13 000&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;rpm for 3 minutes with PBS buffer and the supernatant was dis-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;carded. The washing and re-suspending process was repeated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;three times to remove excess reagents. Human IgG solution was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;prepared at 200 μg mlÀ1 by diluting with PBS buffer for conju-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;gation. The solution containing functionalized MWCNTs was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;then mixed with 100 μl of the human IgG solution and left to react&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;overnight at 4 C. This mixture was centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;3 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. The washing and re-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suspending process was repeated three times to remove unbound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG, and the resulting MWCNT–antibody conjugate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution was kept at 4 C until use.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.3 Preparation of lateral flow immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A nitrocellulose membrane was used as a detection pad with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;designated capture zone for immobilizing Protein A. Fiber glass&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and cellulose membranes were used for sample application and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;for absorption of excess reagents by placing them at the two ends&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the nitrocellulose membrane, respectively. The LF immuno-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;strips were prepared following general procedure reported else-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;where.7,9 First, a nitrocellulose membrane was saturated with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;10% (v/v) methanol in deionized (DI) water for 30 minutes to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;remove any residue and dried in air at room temperature. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane was then treated with 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution to strengthen the immobilization of Protein A on the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nitrocellulose membrane and rinsed with DI water. After drying,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Protein A diluted in PBS buffer to 1 mg mlÀ1 was immobilized at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a designated capture zone by dragging a dispenser with manual&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;control. The membrane was then incubated with 2% BSA and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 in PBS for 1 hour in order to block the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane from making unwanted binding. The membrane was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;rinsed with PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 to remove the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;excess blocking reagent and left to dry at room temperature.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;3. Results and discussion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lateral flow immunosensor was developed by assembling&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a lateral flow strip with sample application, detection, and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;absorbent pads. The specific binding reaction was based on&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immobilized Protein A and human IgG that was detected by the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated MWCNT labels. Since CNTs have inherent affinity&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to biological elements causing non-specific binding, control tests&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were conducted at different functionalization steps. First, the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;PVP treated MWCNTs were applied to the LF immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to bind with immobilized Protein A. As a result, unwanted&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding of the MWCNTs with Protein A at the capture zone was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;observed as shown in Fig. 2(a). This non-specific binding could&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;have been caused by the affinity of the exposed MWCNTs&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surface to the Protein A. Next, the crosslinking agents, EDC and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sulfo-NHS, were added to the PVP treated carbon nanotubes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and the same test was repeated. In this case, no binding reaction&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was observed between the MWCNTs and Protein A at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;capture zone as shown in Fig. 2(b). This result showed that the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surfaces of the MWCNTs were completely covered by the PVP&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and the amide coupling agents limiting unoccupied sites from&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-specific binding. Finally, MWCNT–IgG conjugate solution&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was applied, where binding between human IgG and Protein A&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was evident at the capture zone as shown in Fig. 2(c). Scanning&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone, where the MWCNTs formed a conducting network as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a result of binding. Fig. 3 shows SEM image of the nitrocellulose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane without MWCNT labels and with varying concen-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tration of MWCNT labels corresponding to the amount of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Prior to the immunoassay test, varying concentration of the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugate solutions ranging from 0 to 200 μg mlÀ1 was prepared&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;by dilution in PBS buffer in order to determine the detection limit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the conjugate solution. 50 μl of each solution were applied to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the LF immunosensors where the conjugated human IgG was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;captured by the Protein A at the capture zone resulting in&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric signal as shown in Fig. 4. As depicted in Fig. 4, the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;color intensity of the signal was stronger for higher concentration&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the conjugated human IgG. For quantitative analysis of the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding reaction, the resistance across the capture line was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measured after the complete development of the visible signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;($15 minutes). The measured electrical resistance decreased as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the concentration of the MWCNT–human IgG conjugate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;increased due to the increased amount of MWCNTs forming&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a conducting network. Three replications of the immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;with same conjugate concentration were tested for consistency of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the measurements. The electrical resistance was measured using&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;electrodes with 3 mm spacing and while maintaining same&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;contact resistance.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The developed immunosensor was used with increasing&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;concentration of human IgG as target analyte in solution.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Concentration of the human IgG target analyte ranged from 25&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to 200 μg mlÀ1 and the concentration of the conjugate solution&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was fixed at 200 μg mlÀ1. Each target analyte solution was briefly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;mixed with the conjugate and then the mixture was applied to the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;LF immunosensor as a one-step immunoassay process. As the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sample solution moved across the capture zone, a competitive&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunoassay reaction between the conjugated human IgG and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;those in the solution occurred. This produced a detection signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;by the MWCNTs across the capture line varying in color&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;intensity that was inversely proportional to the amount of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG target analyte captured as shown in Fig. 5(a). The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;detection signals were visible with the application of only 20 μl,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and saturation occurred with the application of 50 μl of total&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sample solutions within 15 minutes. The visibility of the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone decreased with increasing target human IgG concentration.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As the concentration of the target analyte increased, it occupied&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;more binding sites limiting the binding reaction between the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated human IgG and the Protein A. The corresponding&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measured results in Fig. 5(b) clearly show that the electrical&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;resistance increased with increasing concentration of the target&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG. Although the visibility of capture lines decreased with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;increasing target IgG concentration (100, 150, and 200 μg mlÀ1)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Quantitative lateral flow immunosensor using carbon nanotubes as label&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adeyabeba Abera and Jin-Woo Choi*&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Received 28th June 2010, Accepted 26th August 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DOI: 10.1039/c0ay00412j&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A novel immunosensor utilizing multi-walled carbon nanotube as label on a lateral flow system for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;simple and quantitative electrical detection was investigated. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(MWCNTs) were first modified with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for uniform dispersion in aqueous&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution. Then, the MWCNTs were conjugated with human immunoglobulin G (IgG) using 1-(3-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(dimethylamino)-propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) coupling chemistry. The lateral&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;flow immunosensor was made of nitrocellulose membrane that transports sample and reagents through&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a porous structure by capillary action. The performance of the immunosensor was demonstrated using&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG as a model analyte competing with the conjugate (MWCNT-labeled human IgG) at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;capture zone. As a result of binding reaction between the conjugate and the immobilized Protein A at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the capture zone, the conjugated MWCNTs formed a conducting network at the capture zone&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;providing conductance measurement corresponding to the amount of captured conjugate. Quantitative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunoassay response for the target human IgG was demonstrated in the range of 25 to 200 μg mlÀ1&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;without an additional amplification step. The presented immunosensing technique could be expanded&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;for the detection of various analyte-specific biomolecules with a potential for simple and rapid tests&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suitable for point-of-care diagnostics.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;1. Introduction&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lateral flow (LF) immunoassay is one of the most successful&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;point-of-care diagnostic tools commercially available for detecting&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;various health and environmental agents.1–6&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lateral flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunosensor is made of a porous membrane for both immobi-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;lizing biological receptors and transporting sample reagents.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sample reagents are transported in the lateral direction through&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the porous membrane by capillary force and captured by the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;biological receptors immobilized at the capture zone. LF immu-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nosensors are simple to use, low-cost, rapid, and portable with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;relatively long shelf life. Examples of lateral flow diagnostics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;include home pregnancy tests, detection of drugs of abuse, diag-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nosis of infectious diseases, and cancer markers. However, such&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;systems often suffer from low sensitivity, and are mostly restricted&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to qualitative or semi-quantitative measurements.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Generally, LF immunosensors are based on optical detection&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;where tagged particles or enzymes provide visible signal generation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;or amplification. Typically, colloidal gold is used as a label for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric detection traced by the visible color. Several efforts&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;have been made towards signal quantification using enhanced&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric labels or conducting materials such as phosphorescent&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanoparticles,7 polyaniline,8 and polyaniline with colloidal gold.9&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Colorimetric techniques are often limited by low sensitivity while&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;fluorescent techniques suffer from instability, photobleaching,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;activation step, and requirement for a complicated reader device.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This work addresses such limitations by utilizing carbon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanotubes (CNTs) as labeling material for direct electrical signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measurement. CNTs have remarkable one-dimensional elec-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tronic conduction properties and large surface area, and allow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the adsorption of biomolecules for sensing.10–12 In order to utilize&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;these properties of carbon nanotubes for biosensing applications,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surface functionalization is necessary to uniformly disperse&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;CNTs in aqueous solution and immobilize biorecognition&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;molecules on the surface of the nanotubes. Adsorption of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surfactants and polymers on the surface of CNTs is considered as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;an effective method to enhance the dispersion of CNTs without&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;affecting their properties.13–15 Compared to CNTs, other con-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;ducting materials such as colloidal gold and polymer nanowires&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;do not possess the unique material properties suitable for surface&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;functionalization or maintain high electrical conduction after&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding reaction.9,16&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In this work, a new immunoassay technique using carbon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanotube labels on lateral flow system is introduced. The illus-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tration of this technique is shown in Fig. 1. MWCNTs are&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;dispersed in water with PVP using sonication. Adsorption of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;PVP provides a thin and rough layer of organic coating by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;wrapping around the MWCNTs. Human IgG is immobilized on&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the bare (not covered by PVP) surface of the MWCNTs. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNT–human IgG conjugate is then applied on a lateral flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunosensor where the MWCNT–human IgG conjugate is to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;be captured by immobilized Protein A at the capture zone. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated MWCNTs form a conducting network at the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone corresponding to the amount of binding. Consequently,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;quantitative signal can be obtained by simple resistance&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measurement of the capture zone. Blocking schemes were also&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;implemented on the MWCNTs and the lateral flow strips to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;address non-specific interaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2. Methods and experiments&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.1 Materials and reagents&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (purity &amp;amp;gt; 95 wt%)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were obtained from Cheaptubes, Inc. (Brattleboro, VT). Hi-flow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Louisiana State&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA; Web: www.ece.lsu.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;edu/biomems/. E-mail: choi@ece.lsu.edu; Tel: +1-225-578-8764&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Anal. Methods, 2010, 2, 1819–1822 | 1819&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;TECHNICAL NOTE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;www.rsc.org/methods | Analytical Methods&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Downloaded on 30 December 2012&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published on 29 September 2010 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C0AY00412J&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Page 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plus nitrocellulose membranes (HF13502), glass fiber pads,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;cellulose membranes, and a supporting card for lateral flow assay&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were obtained from Millipore (Bedford, MA). Protein A sus-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;pended in solution was obtained from BioVision, Inc. (Mountain&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View, CA). Purified human immunoglobulin G (IgG, 6.2 mg mlÀ1)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suspended in 0.01 M sodium phosphate (0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Poly-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;vinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Mw 10 000), bovine serum albumin (BSA),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tween-20, glutaraldehyde, and 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;acid (MES) were from Sigma-Aldrich. 1-(3-(Dimethylamino)-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS) were obtained from&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Rockford, IL). All immunore-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;agents were diluted in pH 7.4 phosphate saline buffer (PBS) unless&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;noted otherwise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.2 MWCNT–antibody conjugation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In order to start the conjugation process, 1.5 mg of carboxylated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNTs were dispersed in 2 ml of deionized (DI) water with 0.6&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;mg of PVP. The solution was sonicated for 4 hours in an ultra-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sonic bath at 27 C to exfoliate the MWCNTs and accelerate the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;dispersion. The dispersed solution was mixed with 1 ml of EDC&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(0.4 M) and sulfo-NHS (0.1 M) in pH 6.1 MES buffer. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution was left to react for 30 minutes with gentle agitation at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;room temperature. The mixture was microcentrifuged at 13 000&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;rpm for 3 minutes with PBS buffer and the supernatant was dis-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;carded. The washing and re-suspending process was repeated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;three times to remove excess reagents. Human IgG solution was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;prepared at 200 μg mlÀ1 by diluting with PBS buffer for conju-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;gation. The solution containing functionalized MWCNTs was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;then mixed with 100 μl of the human IgG solution and left to react&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;overnight at 4 C. This mixture was centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;3 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. The washing and re-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;suspending process was repeated three times to remove unbound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG, and the resulting MWCNT–antibody conjugate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution was kept at 4 C until use.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;2.3 Preparation of lateral flow immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A nitrocellulose membrane was used as a detection pad with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;designated capture zone for immobilizing Protein A. Fiber glass&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and cellulose membranes were used for sample application and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;for absorption of excess reagents by placing them at the two ends&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the nitrocellulose membrane, respectively. The LF immuno-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;strips were prepared following general procedure reported else-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;where.7,9 First, a nitrocellulose membrane was saturated with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;10% (v/v) methanol in deionized (DI) water for 30 minutes to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;remove any residue and dried in air at room temperature. The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane was then treated with 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;solution to strengthen the immobilization of Protein A on the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nitrocellulose membrane and rinsed with DI water. After drying,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Protein A diluted in PBS buffer to 1 mg mlÀ1 was immobilized at&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a designated capture zone by dragging a dispenser with manual&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;control. The membrane was then incubated with 2% BSA and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 in PBS for 1 hour in order to block the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane from making unwanted binding. The membrane was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;rinsed with PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 to remove the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;excess blocking reagent and left to dry at room temperature.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;3. Results and discussion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lateral flow immunosensor was developed by assembling&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a lateral flow strip with sample application, detection, and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;absorbent pads. The specific binding reaction was based on&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immobilized Protein A and human IgG that was detected by the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated MWCNT labels. Since CNTs have inherent affinity&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to biological elements causing non-specific binding, control tests&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were conducted at different functionalization steps. First, the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;PVP treated MWCNTs were applied to the LF immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to bind with immobilized Protein A. As a result, unwanted&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding of the MWCNTs with Protein A at the capture zone was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;observed as shown in Fig. 2(a). This non-specific binding could&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;have been caused by the affinity of the exposed MWCNTs&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surface to the Protein A. Next, the crosslinking agents, EDC and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sulfo-NHS, were added to the PVP treated carbon nanotubes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and the same test was repeated. In this case, no binding reaction&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was observed between the MWCNTs and Protein A at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;capture zone as shown in Fig. 2(b). This result showed that the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;surfaces of the MWCNTs were completely covered by the PVP&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and the amide coupling agents limiting unoccupied sites from&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-specific binding. Finally, MWCNT–IgG conjugate solution&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was applied, where binding between human IgG and Protein A&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was evident at the capture zone as shown in Fig. 2(c). Scanning&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fig. 1 Illustration of the detection principle using carbon nanotubes as label for quantitative lateral flow immunosensing in competitive format. Carbon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;nanotubes form a conducting network at the capture zone corresponding to the amount of binding reaction. Consequently, quantitative signal can be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;obtained by simple resistance measurement of the capture zone.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;1820 | Anal. Methods, 2010, 2, 1819–1822&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Downloaded on 30 December 2012&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published on 29 September 2010 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C0AY00412J&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View Article Online&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Page 3&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone, where the MWCNTs formed a conducting network as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a result of binding. Fig. 3 shows SEM image of the nitrocellulose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;membrane without MWCNT labels and with varying concen-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tration of MWCNT labels corresponding to the amount of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Prior to the immunoassay test, varying concentration of the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugate solutions ranging from 0 to 200 μg mlÀ1 was prepared&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;by dilution in PBS buffer in order to determine the detection limit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the conjugate solution. 50 μl of each solution were applied to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the LF immunosensors where the conjugated human IgG was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;captured by the Protein A at the capture zone resulting in&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;colorimetric signal as shown in Fig. 4. As depicted in Fig. 4, the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;color intensity of the signal was stronger for higher concentration&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the conjugated human IgG. For quantitative analysis of the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;binding reaction, the resistance across the capture line was&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measured after the complete development of the visible signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;($15 minutes). The measured electrical resistance decreased as&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the concentration of the MWCNT–human IgG conjugate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;increased due to the increased amount of MWCNTs forming&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a conducting network. Three replications of the immunosensors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;with same conjugate concentration were tested for consistency of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the measurements. The electrical resistance was measured using&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;electrodes with 3 mm spacing and while maintaining same&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;contact resistance.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The developed immunosensor was used with increasing&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;concentration of human IgG as target analyte in solution.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Concentration of the human IgG target analyte ranged from 25&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;to 200 μg mlÀ1 and the concentration of the conjugate solution&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;was fixed at 200 μg mlÀ1. Each target analyte solution was briefly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;mixed with the conjugate and then the mixture was applied to the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;LF immunosensor as a one-step immunoassay process. As the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sample solution moved across the capture zone, a competitive&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;immunoassay reaction between the conjugated human IgG and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;those in the solution occurred. This produced a detection signal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;by the MWCNTs across the capture line varying in color&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;intensity that was inversely proportional to the amount of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG target analyte captured as shown in Fig. 5(a). The&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;detection signals were visible with the application of only 20 μl,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;and saturation occurred with the application of 50 μl of total&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sample solutions within 15 minutes. The visibility of the capture&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;zone decreased with increasing target human IgG concentration.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As the concentration of the target analyte increased, it occupied&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;more binding sites limiting the binding reaction between the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conjugated human IgG and the Protein A. The corresponding&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;measured results in Fig. 5(b) clearly show that the electrical&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;resistance increased with increasing concentration of the target&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG. Although the visibility of capture lines decreased with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;increasing target IgG concentration (100, 150, and 200 μg mlÀ1),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fig. 2 Non-specific adsorption on the nitrocellulose membrane: (a)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNTs partially coated with PVP were captured by Protein A due to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-specific adsorption which must be addressed to avoid false signal; (b)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;almost no detection signal was observed at the capture zone indicating&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;that the surface of the MWCNTs were completely covered eliminating&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-specific adsorption, and (c) selective binding between the MWCNT–&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;human IgG conjugate and immobilized Protein A.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fig. 3 SEM images of the MWCNT network at the capture zone: (a) before sample application; (b) lower MWCNT coverage due to a smaller number&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of binding; and (c) higher MWCNT coverage due to a larger number of binding. The scale bar is 1 μm.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fig. 4 Calibration results using conjugate solutions in different&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;concentrations. MWCNTs as label provided a quantitative detection&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;capability.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Anal. Methods, 2010, 2, 1819–1822 | 1821&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Downloaded on 30 December 2012&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published on 29 September 2010 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C0AY00412J&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View Article Online&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Page 4&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the electrical measurements clearly showed differences corre-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;sponding to the various concentrations at all levels.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;4. Conclusions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lateral flow immunosensing technique using carbon nanotubes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;as a label was effectively demonstrated for quantitative antibody&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;detection based on simple electrical measurements. The surface&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of the MWCNTs was partially modified with PVP for uniform&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;dispersion in aqueous solutions. Further functionalization steps&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;were conducted to attach antibodies on the exposed surface of&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNTs utilizing EDC/sulfo-NHS chemistry. The modified&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;MWCNTs successfully provided both direct colorimetric and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;conductimetric measurements for antibody binding without addi-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tion amplification step. SEM images showed the MWCNT&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;network formed as a result of antibody binding at the capture zone.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The lateral flow system facilitated the binding reaction and reagent&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;handling in a simple and convenient manner. This immunosensing&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;technique is easy for integration and requires ordinary tools for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;signal measurement. Therefore, it holds the potential for quanti-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;tative determination of various antibodies and antigen in a point-&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of-care setup. The detection limit and time could be improved&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;further with proper optimization of the conjugating process and&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the lateral flow system&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lateral_Flow]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Paul.xu</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>