Editing
Antibody Design by AI
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Training an ensemble of neural networks == We used '''six''' different architectures, '''five '''of which were'''convolutional neural networks''' with '''1 or 2 convolutional layers''' with filter size of 1, 3 or 5 residues and stride 1, followed by local max-pooling layer with window size 2 and stride 2. We used 64 and 32 convolutional filters for single convolutional layer networks. In one of the double convolutional layer networks, we used 32 filters with width 5 in first layer and 64 filters with width 5 in the second layer. In the other network, we used 8 convolutional filters with width 1 in first layer to learn an embedding from one-hot to hidden space for each amino acid, and then used 64 filters with width 5 to learn higher level patterns. In each of the convolutional neural network, the output from last convolutional layer was fed into a fully connected layer with 16 hidden units and a dropout layer. It is then connected to the final output layer where the loss function is evaluated. We also designed a 2- layer fully connected neural network with 32 hidden units and dropout in each layer. Table S1 illustrates the detailed setup of each architecture and an estimation of the number of parameters in each architecture. All the neural networks were implemented using Keras 27. Training was conducted with respect to the binary cross entropy loss function in our classification task and the mean squared error loss in the regression tasks. For the multi-output regression networks, we used a masked mean squared error loss to deal with the missing values during training. Model hyperparameters were tuned by grid search using 10% of the training set as validation set and 5 epochs of quick training. The hyperparameters that yielded best validation loss were chosen for the training phase on the complete training set. We trained each neural network for 20 epochs using RMSProp optimization 28, and retained the learned network parameters from the epoch that produced best performance on the held-out test set.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ELN may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ELN:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Category:
Main page
To Do
Tasks
My ELN
Weekly Reports
Buffer Recipe
SOP
Protocols
Inventories
Projects
Products
Customers
Contacts
Suppliers
Vectors
Vector Map
Clones
Cloning
Sequencing
NGS
Protein Expression
Purchaseing
QC
293 Expression
CHO Expression
Sf9 Expression
Protein Purification
Stem Cells
Cytokines
Protein Kinases
GPCR
Cell Lines
Competent Cells
Viral Proteins
VLP
Baculovirus
AAV
Adenovirus
Lentivirus
Virus Titering
Antibodies
Transfection
ELISA
qPCR RT-PCR
ImmunoAssay
Multiplex BioAssa
Lateral_Flow
Conjugation
Compounds Synthesis
BioEngineering
GenomeEngineering
Services
Software
Ideas
Links
Knowledgebase
Employees
Company
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Navigation
Special pages