Editing
Antibody Design by AI
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Stringent washing improves antibody EC50 prediction == The enrichment of a CDR-H3 sequence in a phage panning experiment is only an approximation of affinity for a target. During panning Fab fragments displayed on phages specific for the target are competing with both non-binding and poly-specific (“sticky”) Fab fragments. Standard washing conditions are designed to reduce non-binding Fab fragments with multiple washing cycles. Poly-specific Fab fragments are depleted by using blocking agents (Supplemental Methods). We hypothesized that we could improve the correspondence between phage panning enrichment and IgG affinity by using stringent washing condition during phage panning to reduce non-specific interactions. We defined a stringent wash buffer with increased ionic strength to interrupt salt bridges (0.75M NaCl) and with a detergent to reduce hydrophobic interactions (2% Octyl β-D-glucopyranoside) in 0.1M Tris at pH 7.4. We expected that this stringent washing buffer would reduce both non-specific binding and weak specific binding. Weak specific binding can result from a low number of ionic and / or hydrophobic target interactions. We performed panning experiments against ranibizumab using this stringent wash buffer starting in the second round of panning. Selected sequences at differing enrichments were produced as full-length IgG molecules, and used in an ELISA EC50 29 assay as a measure of antibody affinity. We found that the stringent buffer increased the correspondence between panning enrichment and affinity (Table S3, Fig. S3A). The Spearman rank correlations between enrichment and affinity for the sequences in Table S3 are 0.266 (p = 0.404, n = 12) for standard washing condition, and 0.371 (p = 0.236, n = 12) for stringent washing condition. Alternative machine learning methods for proposing sequences In addition to our neural network ensemble, three other machine learning frameworks were also applied to generate novel CDR-H3 sequences. Here, we detail these alternative computational approaches to antibody design that were less successful than our Ens-Grad methodology.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ELN may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ELN:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Category:
Main page
To Do
Tasks
My ELN
Weekly Reports
Buffer Recipe
SOP
Protocols
Inventories
Projects
Products
Customers
Contacts
Suppliers
Vectors
Vector Map
Clones
Cloning
Sequencing
NGS
Protein Expression
Purchaseing
QC
293 Expression
CHO Expression
Sf9 Expression
Protein Purification
Stem Cells
Cytokines
Protein Kinases
GPCR
Cell Lines
Competent Cells
Viral Proteins
VLP
Baculovirus
AAV
Adenovirus
Lentivirus
Virus Titering
Antibodies
Transfection
ELISA
qPCR RT-PCR
ImmunoAssay
Multiplex BioAssa
Lateral_Flow
Conjugation
Compounds Synthesis
BioEngineering
GenomeEngineering
Services
Software
Ideas
Links
Knowledgebase
Employees
Company
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Navigation
Special pages