PLentiGP-Cre: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 13:59, 21 July 2011
Cloning of Cre to pLentiGP
[edit]Purpose: cloning of Cre to pLentiGP
Date: 2011-6-28 to 2011-6-29 (2011-7-5 to 2011-7-8)
Notebook:Ruili Su (haiyan lei)
Page:002788--002789
Clone ID:# 241
Experimenters: Ruili
PCR
[edit]Date: 2011-6-28
PCR to amplify Cre
1. Marker
3. Amplified Cre fragment from PCR.
Cloning
[edit]Digest PlentiGP (clone 219) with EcoRI+ XhoI
Digest LoxP fregment with EcoRI+ XhoI
cut out insert and vector, ligate and transform STBL3
1. Marker.
4. Digested PlentiGP (clone 219) with ECoRI+ XHoI
5. Digested Cre fragment with ECoRI+ XHoI
Line 2: PlentiGP/ECoRI+ XHoI (241 Cre vector)
Line 3: PlentiGP/BamHI+ XHoI (259 Loxp vector)
Line 4: PlentiGP/NheI+ XHoI (pka vector)
Line 5: pAAV-GFP/EcoRI+ XHoI (254 pAAV-MCS vector)
Line 6: 10ul Cre PCR amplified product (50ul volume)
Line 7: 10ul Loxp PCR amplified product (50ul volume)
hylei, 07-08-11
Result intepretation/Summary
[edit]The line 4 and line 5 show digestion with ECoRI+ XHoI
The line 5 (digested Cre fragment with ECoRI+ XHoI) shows the same size as the line 3 (amplified Cre fragment from PCR).
Conclusion
[edit]The digestion is complete and good,
Ruili.su 14:52, 28 June 2011 (EST)
Comments
[edit]clone #5 is junk, Ruil's clone is not good.
The above was done by Ruili
Repeat
[edit]The following exp was done by Paul
PCR
[edit]Amplify Cre using Lenti-Cre-F + Lenti-Cre-R, template: pTriEx-HTNC, 25 cycles, TurboPfu
Run gel and purify PCR fragment.
--Paul.xu 16:26, 10 July 2011 (EST)
Cloning
[edit]
1: pLVGP, 6-17-2011, EcoR1+Xho1+Nde1
2: pLentiGP, 6-16-2011, #2, EcoR1+Xho1+Nde1
3: pLentiGP, 6-16-2011, #1, EcoR1+Xho1+Nde1
4: pLentiPlus, #3, EcoR1+Xho1+Nde1
5: pLVGP, EcoR1+Xho1
6: pLentiPlus, EcoR1+Xho1
7: Cre PCR fragment, EcoR1+Xho1
8: Cre PCR fragment,, EcoR1+Xho1
Purify vectors #5 & #6
Purify PCR fragment, #7 & #8
Ligate#5 + #7, #6+#8. Transform STBL3, grow on LB/Amp o/n
--Paul.xu 16:08, 10 July 2011 (EST)
Line 1: PlentiPlus clone ID: 219 (tube 1), NdeI + EcoR1
Line 2: PlentiPlus clone ID: 219 (tube 2), NdeI + EcoR1
Line 3: PlentiPlus clone ID: 219 (tube 3), NdeI + EcoR1
Line 4: PlentiPlus Amp 3 , NdeI + EcoR1
Conclusion: MCS is intack.
--Paul.xu 16:08, 10 July 2011 (EST)
2: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP (ID, 242),#1, Xba1+Nde1
3: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP(ID, 242),#2, Xba1+Nde1
4: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP(ID, 242),#3, Xba1+Nde11
5: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP(ID, 242),#4, Xba1+Nde1
6: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP(ID, 242),#5, Xba1+Nde1
7: pLenti-PKA(ID, 300), #1,Nhe1+Xho1
8: pLenti-PKA(ID, 300), #2,Nhe1+Xho1
Sequencing: pAd5-CMV-2-IRES-GFP(ID, 242),#2;
1: Marker
2: plenti-pka(ID, 300), #3,Nhe1+Xho1
3: plenti-pka(ID, 300), #4,Nhe1+Xho1
4: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#1, KpnI+Nco1
5: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#2, KpnI+Nco1
6: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#3, KpnI+Nco1
7: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#4, KpnI+Nco1
8: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#5, KpnI+Nco1
Sequencing: pLenti-pka(ID, 300), #3
pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#2
1: Marker
2: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#1, KpnI+Nco1
3: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#2, KpnI+Nco1
4: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#3, KpnI+Nco1
5: pAAV-MCS(ID, 254) ,#4, KpnI+Nco1
6: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#1, NdeI+XbaI
7: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#2, NdeI+XbaI
8: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#3, NdeI+XbaI
9: Marker
10: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#4, NdeI+XbaI
11: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#5, NdeI+XbaI
sequencing: pAd5-CMV-MCS(ID, 280) ,#1
2011-07-21 Haiyan, for pet his-cre and 256 colonies creening
1: Marker
2: PET 8His(ID, 286) , Xhoi+Nco1
3: plentiCre(ID, 241) ,Xhoi+Nco1
4: pAAV-cre(ID, 256) ,#1, ecori+xhoi
5: pAAV-cre(ID, 256) ,#2, ecori+xhoi
6: pAAV-cre(ID, 256) ,#3, ecori+xhoi
ligate 2 &3; colonies screening for 256, 5 and 6 should be positive.
Digestion and gel
