PET28b-Cre-purification: Difference between revisions

From ELN
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ruili.su (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 13:30, 30 December 2011

PET28b-KOD & Cre 375--12-14-2011.jpg

Date:12/09/2011---12/15/2011

Notebook: Ruili Su

Page:002869--002871

Line 1 through 7 is for PET28b-KOD protein (DNA clone is 480)--except line 4 (Transform with Rosetta BL21 (DE3) PlysS and IPTG induced);

Line1: Supernatant after ultracentrifuge;

Line2: Flow through from Ni column;

Line 3: Washed with I20(20mM Imidazole) from Ni column;

Line 5: washed with I50 from Ni column;

Line 6: eluted fraction 1 with Buffer B ( containing I300) from Ni column;

Line 7: eluted fraction 2.


Line 4, 8 through 11 is for PET28b-Cre protein (DNA clone is 375).

Line 8: Flow through from Ni column;

Line 9: Washed with I20 from Ni column;

Line 10: Washed fraction 1 with I50 from Ni column;

Line 11: washed fraction 2 with I50 from Ni column;

Line 4: washed fraction 3 with I50 from Ni column;

Result

1.

2. the protein expression for PET28b-Cre is not so good.




PET28b-Cre & Taq Muts--12-16-2011.jpg

Date: 12/16/2011--12/17/2011

Notebook: ruili su

Page: 002872

Line 1: Protein Cre(PET28b-Cre)  flow through from FPLC; (10ul)

Line 2--5: Protein Cre washed with  I30 (30 mM imidazole) for fraction 17--20; ()10ul


Line 6-11 Eluted protein Taq-Muts with buffer B for fractions. (10ul)

Result

Cre protein had good expression, and the size is correct (~40KD). Futherly, need to dylize with buffer C and buffer D;


PET28b-Cre-12-21-2011.jpg

Date: 12/19/2011--12/21/2011

NotebooK: Ruili Su

Page: 002873--002874

After FPLC, detect protein with Braford Reagent and run SDS-PAGE;

Line 1--3: Cre washed with I30 from FPLC;

Line 4--10: Cre is washed with I50 from FPLC.

Result

The protein has good expression level, and combining the fractions to dialyse.

--Ruili.su 18:02, 21 December 2011 (EST)