1353-1305-1369 transfection on 0913-2012: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Xiuli.huang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 12:28, 18 September 2012
| No. |
ID |
Plasmid Name |
conc.(ug/ul) | Lipofectanine 2000 |
Roche |
| 1 |
1353 |
pCMV5-Fc(3C)-RFP-WPRE |
2.0 | very weak red at 24hs |
no |
| 2 |
1305 |
pCMV5-Fc(3C)-TagRFP |
1.0 | very weak red at 24hs |
no |
| 3 |
1369 |
pCMV5-Fc-(3c)-TagRFP-WPRE-oriP |
2.8 | very weak red at 24hs |
no |
| 4 |
174 |
pLVXPlus2-IRES-mCherry |
0.58 | red |
less red |
| 5 |
529 |
pLVX-mIL10-IRES-EGFP |
2.8 | strong |
less strong |
12 well plate transfection (293F cells):
use 2 ug DNA plasmid and 6 ul lipofectamine and Roche transfection reagents . There is no RFP in clone 1353,1305 and 1369 at 16 hs, and start to show RFP at 24 hours. Cells started to die becase of the toxicity of lipo2000, For clone 529 and 174, transfection efficiency as expected.
Conclutsion: weak RFP expression with Lipofectamine 2000.